On 9/12/08, Marcus Moeller <mm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Alain. ... > Currently, most of the work is done by yourself. You have setup test > systems and are working on projects like Mantis design (and maybe > re-design of the main page) > > So it's hard to get involved besides suggestions and comments. Even suggestions and comments are very very very helpful actions, what is needed to get people involved beyond that ? >> 1. Mailing lists: Introduce and discuss your ideas (in CentOS-devel >> list.). > > I would personally prefer a seperate Artwork ML where technical > details can be discussed. Results could still be announced on -devel. That is probably into the developers' plans. >> 2. Artwork svn repository: Add your ideas. > > We should keep all updates in SVN. This would make things much easier > (even to decide who is working on which parts). I'm agree. > It would also be great > if SIG members could have access to test DOMs, so it's not necessary > to set up local installations. Don't know what you exactly want to mean with 'have access to test DOMs, so it's not necessary to set up local installations' . Local installation of what ? DOMs = Document Object Models ? >> 3. Artwork Trac instance: Browse changes friendly, document >> changes, submit tickets ... > >> at the end of http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork page. Are they the right >> steps to follow? Is that page the right place for that ? > > I am not sure on that, yet. If we are planning to use Trac, the wiki > page should just link to it (as Trac does include a wiki, too). Afaik > livecd is almost happening on Trac. Well, don't know if correct but, wiki.centos.org is for general documentation, trac would be used to document specificities of each project. ... > Here is step 4: > > We need to set up something like a timeline or a plan. There are > several projects going on atm like Mantis or Definitely. Does the work done at the moment could help on building a timeline or plan for actual and further works ? and is something missing to complete the needed parts of the distribution redesign. > the $LANG sites, where > it's not yet clear (to me) what is going to happen or already > happening but kept secret. Actually afaik, to get $LANG sites is need a common design, something that fits what we have on the wiki, trac, and recently in mantis. To do that the application proposed was Puntal. Personally, I tried to reach http://www.puntal.fr and my DNS couldn't resolved the related IP address of that site. Have any of you the same situation ? Cheers, al.
