Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 08/31/2008 07:11 PM, Mats Karlsson wrote: >> I agree with Will. >> >> The page should be changed to reflect how it's done in 5.x or forked >> into two pages, "The 4.x way" and "The 5.x way". >> > Am I missing something here? mod_ssl contains the exact same code in > %post in both C4.6 and C5.2. And in both cases the generated [dummy] > certificate leaves the system in a ready-to-be-used (although not really > recommended) configuration. Yes. Maybe this page should be extended a bit so it actually shows what has to be *in* the keys (meaning the actual dialog from openssl), so that you run with your *own* self signed certificate and not the one from the package? I actually like the openssl commands on that page (as a reference). But yes, there should be some explanation of what they actually do. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080901/7ef2bb2a/attachment.bin
