Spike Turner wrote: > Fabian Arrotin wrote: > >> So not related to CentOS ... > >>> and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). >>> The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to >>> security = share. However 3.0.32 comes with a blank smb.conf >>> making it harder to get a secure server >>> up and running. > >> Same as above > > These are the rpms on my CentOS box > > samba-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm > samba-client-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm > samba-common-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm > samba-swat-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm > > they are the latest that CentOS rebuilt from upstream. As an > aside the RFE on the upstream provider refers to the version > shipped (and by extension by CentOS) not covering all bugs > and issues fixed in 3.0.29 to 3.0.32. > Spike, Please read this to understand how upstream (and by extension CentOS) handles security issues: http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
