R P Herrold wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Marcus Moeller wrote: > >> Dear Russ. > >>> I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is ** not ** >>> covereed between the Ed Bailey, and the Eric Foster-Johnson, the >>> GuruLabs resources (each down those links). > >> I am speaking about the CentOS Wiki and nothing more. I think pages >> like the Yum and RPM page should cover aspects of handling both tools >> and the build process should be described on a seperate page and linked >> from there. > > My question stands unanswered: 'what in the world, which is material, > you think is ** not ** covered' presently? > > Adding yet another secondary source, frankly written by people who are > NOT and have not been active in the builder, nor the RPM communities, > does not add light. Your opinion. Having stuff like that spluttered all over the wiki in pages which clearly don't have anything to do with rpm building doesn't help either. > I don't see an improvement for the CentOS brand by simply increasing > quantity. Centralized point of documentation. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20080721/9456f7a2/attachment.bin
