On Dec 9, 2007 7:47 AM, Tim Verhoeven <tim.verhoeven.be@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007 4:07 PM, R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, R P Herrold wrote: > > > > > I still have never received a subscription change notice on > > > pages I later see have changed. > > > > Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters > > in play. To help me run this down, could a person actually > > having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a > > single piece into this thread, please? > > This is the header of such a mail : > > Delivered-To: tim.verhoeven.be@xxxxxxxxx > Received: by 10.100.8.18 with SMTP id 18cs38186anh; > Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) > Received: by 10.67.23.5 with SMTP id a5mr4491929ugj.1197146246471; > Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST) > Return-Path: <noreply@xxxxxxxxxx> > Received: from centosx.centos.org Russ, I don't have any filter in place other than those provided by gmail. And we discussed the possibility of your procmail filter being in play, you somehow showed a proof that the filter is not the cause of the problem. [OT: I suggested the problem would be due to the procfmail filter being too sophisticated. hughesjr pointed out that your procmail is sophisticated not by design but due to typos :-D ] Akemi
