On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Something that may be important in the longer run: do we ask that >> people provide content under a specific license? At this point in >> time it is still possible to add such requirement, it would be more >> difficult to do it retroactively. > > Wow. Anyone firm with the (sometimes rather strange) CC wording on > their licenses? I never really thought about that for a wiki and I > really do have a hard time choosing one of those licences. > > They have a wiki license (licence or license? What is it?) > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> - or at least they > promote that for usage on Wikis. > > But is this really what we/you/they/others want? I use /by-nc-sa/2.5 on my personal site, but /by-sa/2.5/ is fine with me. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein@xxxxxxxxxx <> www.madboa.com
