Karanbir Singh wrote: > whats the general feeling ? is it worth getting in touch with the > authors and seeing if they would like to maintain them on the wiki > instead ? If they're worth it - sure. > I know some of them are really mad and we wont / dont want to highlight > them too much ( like, gnome-2.16 hacked into a centos-4 machine! ), but > there do seem to be a few good ones there too. > > opinions ? All for it. What we also could use is a link to the wiki from www.centos.org (Calling Mr. Nelson! Mr. Nelson!) ... Cheers, Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 M?nchen | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061002/349f1ad9/attachment.bin
