On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 06:16 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:01 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Opinions, please. > > > > Anyone? > > > > Personally, I think openpub is the best choice. It is what Red Hat and > Fedora Core use on all their documentation. > > It does require (though) a page that tracks version/revision with the > author listed, so may not be easily doable for a wiki. > > It is what the "Managing Software with Yum" doc is licensed under (for > example): > > http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/yum/ OK ... so I lied :) The yum doc is released under this license: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html (Another one to look at) :) All the RH and FC official documentation is openpub though ... Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061103/d4ca54ee/attachment.bin
