Re: [PATCH] lsb: Include runtime languages module

[Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> Am 27.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Joe MacDonald <Joe_MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> Modern systems rely heavily on runtime languages that had not
> traditionally been used in large-scale environments.  The LSB requirement
> should be updated to reflect that new reality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald <joe_macdonald@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> cgl_5.0_requirements.rst                       | 18 ++++++++++--------
> cgl_5.0_testing-documentation-requirements.rst | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
[..]
> +|  The developer may choose to implement more than one architecture platform.  |
> +|  In this case, each supported architecture platform shall contain an         |
> +|  implementation of at least one architecture specific LSB-Core module and    |
> +|  one LSB-Runtime Languages module.                                           |


what is your experience how flexible is the LSB language module with the versions?
I just had some encounter on CentOS where no single version of Ruby packaged for CentOS was usable to the devs.
It was all far too outdated, and we had to avoid using the standard Ruby.

Sorry for the stupid question, I know I’m not up to date on this.

Flo
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier