Hello Joe S,
I know that Joe M started an update work for CGL requirements already.
Maybe your suggestions can also go there as PR. Would that sound ok for you?
Link available here: joeythesaint/cgl-specification
|
Thanks,
Alex V.
On Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:56 PM, "Slater, Joseph" <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Below is a proposal I made a few months ago to move CGL 5.0 requirement
std.1.0 to LSB 5.0 and to also only require LSB-Core.
I do not recall seeing any reaction to the proposal. If there are no
objections, I think we should change CGL 5.0 as soon as possible to
avoid continued dependence on an outdated specification.
Joe S
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Slater [mailto:jslater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:16 PM
> To: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Slater, Joseph
> Subject: [lf_carrier][PATCH 1/1] std.1.0: move to LSB 5.0
>
> Do not require the desktop module, which means
> that graphics need not be supported. Do not require
> the languages module, which means perl and python
> need not be present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> cgl_5.0_requirements.rst | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst b/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> index e6ad794..32e464d 100644
> --- a/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> +++ b/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> @@ -2781,23 +2781,18 @@ STD.1.0 Linux Standard Base Compliance
> +===============+=====================================+=============+==========+
> | STD.1.0 | Linux Standard Base Compliance | |std| | P1 |
> +---------------+-------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
> -| http://www.linuxbase.org CGL specifies that carrier grade |
> -| Linux shall be compliant with the Linux Standard Base (LSB) 3.0 The LSB |
> -| 3.0 specification has been split into a generic LSB core, a generic |
> -| module for C++, and a set of architecture specific modules. Required LSB |
> -| 3.0 modules for CGL are: |
> +| http://www.linuxbase.org CGL specifies that carrier grade Linux shall be |
> +| compliant with the Linux Standard Base (LSB) 5.0 The LSB 5.0 specification |
> +| has been split into several modules. Required LSB 5.0 modules for CGL are: |
> | |
> | - Generic LSB-Core |
> | |
> -| - Generic LSB-CXX |
> -| |
> -| - For each supported architecture, one LSB-Core module and one LSB-CXX |
> -| module |
> +| - For each supported architecture, one LSB-Core module |
> | |
> | The developer may choose to implement more than one architecture |
> | platform. In this case, each supported architecture platform shall |
> | contain an implementation of at least one architecture specific LSB-Core |
> -| module and one architecture specific LSB-CXX module. |
> +| module. |
> +---------------+-------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
>
> STD.3.1 SCTP - Base Features
> --
> 1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
std.1.0 to LSB 5.0 and to also only require LSB-Core.
I do not recall seeing any reaction to the proposal. If there are no
objections, I think we should change CGL 5.0 as soon as possible to
avoid continued dependence on an outdated specification.
Joe S
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Slater [mailto:jslater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:16 PM
> To: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Slater, Joseph
> Subject: [lf_carrier][PATCH 1/1] std.1.0: move to LSB 5.0
>
> Do not require the desktop module, which means
> that graphics need not be supported. Do not require
> the languages module, which means perl and python
> need not be present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> cgl_5.0_requirements.rst | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst b/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> index e6ad794..32e464d 100644
> --- a/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> +++ b/cgl_5.0_requirements.rst
> @@ -2781,23 +2781,18 @@ STD.1.0 Linux Standard Base Compliance
> +===============+=====================================+=============+==========+
> | STD.1.0 | Linux Standard Base Compliance | |std| | P1 |
> +---------------+-------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
> -| http://www.linuxbase.org CGL specifies that carrier grade |
> -| Linux shall be compliant with the Linux Standard Base (LSB) 3.0 The LSB |
> -| 3.0 specification has been split into a generic LSB core, a generic |
> -| module for C++, and a set of architecture specific modules. Required LSB |
> -| 3.0 modules for CGL are: |
> +| http://www.linuxbase.org CGL specifies that carrier grade Linux shall be |
> +| compliant with the Linux Standard Base (LSB) 5.0 The LSB 5.0 specification |
> +| has been split into several modules. Required LSB 5.0 modules for CGL are: |
> | |
> | - Generic LSB-Core |
> | |
> -| - Generic LSB-CXX |
> -| |
> -| - For each supported architecture, one LSB-Core module and one LSB-CXX |
> -| module |
> +| - For each supported architecture, one LSB-Core module |
> | |
> | The developer may choose to implement more than one architecture |
> | platform. In this case, each supported architecture platform shall |
> | contain an implementation of at least one architecture specific LSB-Core |
> -| module and one architecture specific LSB-CXX module. |
> +| module. |
> +---------------+-------------------------------------+-------------+----------+
>
> STD.3.1 SCTP - Base Features
> --
> 1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
_______________________________________________ Lf_carrier mailing list Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
