CGL V4.0 Registration from Asianux Corp.

[lily.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxx (lily)]

Hi Joe and CGL workgroup,
We already put our registration documents on our public website.
The website is 
http://www.asianux.com/CGL/Asianux4.0_cgl4.0_registration.php.
Please check it. Any further requirement, please let us know. Thank you.

Best Regards,
Lily
Software Engineer
Test Team
Server Development Department
Tel: 010-62160610
Fax: 010-62160580
Asianux Corporation Ltd.
www.asianux.com


? 2011/3/30 2:18, Joe MacDonald ??:
> Hi Lily,
>
> [Re: CGL V4.0 Registration from Asianux Corp.] On 11.03.29 (Tue 17:27) lily wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe and CGL workgroup,
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing our documentation.
>>
>> We agree to put our registration under the category of "Does Not
>> Implement All Mandatory Requirements". And the current company
>> graphic is ok for us.
>>
>> For the disclosure type in our registration documentation, we think
>> it is suitable for us. Thank you for your good suggestion.
>>
>> For the registration page, we will start to prepare it soon, maybe
>> it will be finished in the middle of April, we will inform to you
>> when finish.
> Excellent!  Thanks for your participation.  Let us know when you've got
> your registration documents up on some public website and we'll link to
> them for you.
>
> -Joe MacDonald (on behalf of the CGL Workgroup).
>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Lily
>> Software Engineer
>> Test Team
>> Server Development Department
>> Tel: 010-62160610
>> Fax: 010-62160580
>> Asianux Corporation Ltd.
>> www.asianux.com
>>
>>
>> ? 2011/3/28 21:20, Joe MacDonald ??:
>>> Hi Lily,
>>>
>>> [CGL V4.0 Registration from Asianux Corp.] On 11.02.22 (Tue 15:44) lily wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi CGL workgroup,
>>>>
>>>> This is lily from Asianux Corporation Ltd. We want to apply for CGL
>>>> V4.0 Registration. Attachment are all required information as
>>>> defined in the CGL V4.0 Registration Template. Please check them.
>>>> Any further requirement, please let us know.
>>>> Thank you.
>>> Please accept our apologies for the delay in responding to your
>>> registration.  We have reviewed your documentation and are able to
>>> approve your registration under the category of "Does Not Implement All
>>> Mandatory Requirements", that is section 1.2 on the Registered
>>> Distributions page.  If you are satisfied with this, you are responsible
>>> for making a copy of your registration forms.  Once you have it up and
>>> accessible, please provide us a URL where we can access it and we will
>>> link to your documentation from the CGL Registered Distributions web
>>> page at:
>>>
>>>    http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/cgl/registered-distributions#CGL_version_4.0_registered
>>>
>>> Currently the graphic we have for your distribution is here:
>>>
>>>    http://www.linuxfoundation.org/images/6/68/Asianux.jpeg
>>>
>>> If you would like us to use a different graphic for your registration
>>> information on the distributions page, please let us know.
>>>
>>> If you would like to amend your registration in order to be listed in
>>> section 1.1, the category of "Implements All Mandatory Requirements",
>>> you will need to amend the following sections in your registration
>>> documents:
>>>
>>> AVL.3.2	Forced Un-mount
>>>    - Most vendors implement this via one of the forced unmount / badfs
>>>      patches available on the web or in some project pages on kernel.org
>>>
>>> PRF.1.7	Handling Interrupts As Threads
>>>    - You indicate you include the RT patches in your kernel, typically
>>>      this includes Soft IRQ threading, so you may already have this
>>>      requirement implemented.
>>>
>>> SFA.2.1	Live Kernel Remote Debugger
>>>    - This is typically implemented via kgdb.
>>>
>>> STD.11.1	Diameter Protocol CGL Major Features
>>>    - The common implementations of this come from either OpenDiameter or
>>>      FreeDiameter packages, easily found on the web.
>>>
>>> We have the following suggestions for items you may wish to amend in
>>> your registration document prior to posting it, however these changes
>>> are purely recommendations and will not influence your registration:
>>>
>>> You indicate you implement SPM.7.0 with a package called
>>> 'axtsn-client-tools' which is categorized as an "open source community
>>> package".  Is this really an OS community package or a package developed
>>> by Asianux?  If you have developed it yourself, even if it is open
>>> source, you are encouraged to categorize it as "value-added package".
>>>
>>> The same question and comment applies to SFA.6.0, System Snapshot,
>>> implemented via system-config-kdump.
>>>
>>> -Joe MacDonald (on behalf of the CGL workgroup).
>>>