Rationale and/or use cases for requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Soren,

With the previous CGL versions, we opted to develop use cases for some
complex requirements.
If you visit
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Current_CGL_3.1_Use_Cases you can
find
some of these use cases. It was a good tool to rationalize the
requirements and provide
guidance on its use to the developers.

I would suggest to specify with requirements are in questions and people
on this mailing list
who where involved in setting those requirements can discuss it with
you. 

Thank you,
 
       ~ ibrahim

-----Original Message-----
From: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Soren Hansen
Sent: September 11, 2007 8:51 AM
To: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Rationale and/or use cases for requirements

Hi!

I'm going through the requirement documents and I've found a few
requirements that are not fulfilled the system I'm evaluating. In order
to be able to file good bug reports and write specifications, it would
be nice if I could see the use cases or rationale for the specific
requirement.

I'm not suggesting you spend a month writing this up in formal documents
and such, but I'm supposing the discussion that resulted in these
requirements documents is logged somewhere?

--
Soren Hansen
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux