CGL 4.0 registration

[tanderson@xxxxxxxxxx (Tim Anderson)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Joe MacDonald
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:39 AM
> To: Troy Heber
> Cc: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: CGL 4.0 registration
> 

[ snip]

> 
> > 	2. Finish documenting policies and procedures for the
> > 	review board
> 
> Agreed.  And I'll take the opportunity to re-state my offer 
> to help out
> again.  This is something I *really* want to see happen.
> 

I know that Troy had the lead on the docs, we were jointly working on the
Policy and I was working on the template.

> > 	3. Finish the registration template
> 
> Yep, though I think that would be a natural outgrowth of #2.

I have a template mostly ready to go but put it on hold waiting for things to
settle out.


> 
> > 	4. We need a web presence to host the registration
> > 	infrastructure, i.e. documentation, listings, etc.
> 
> I think this would be critical and probably needs to be 
> considered while
> performing #2 and #3 above.
> 
> > 	5. We need a mailing alias setup for the registration team.
> > 
> > 	6. The 4.0 PoC database needs to be made public
> > 
> > 	7. Public announcement that registration is open
> 
> Agreed again.  And I think the strict ordering you've proposed is also
> the right one.
> 
> > I just don't think we're in any position to move forward on 
> this until
> > we have a better understanding of how CGL will fit in with the LF
> > framework.
> 
> I hope that this discussion will also help the LF reps get a 
> better idea
> of where we were and what we needed (or were telling OSDL needed
> improvement) so they can answer the questions we need answered.  What
> resources are going to be made available to CGL for promoting the
> standards, evolving the standards as the industry evolves and 
> supporting
> the companies and individuals who are invested in the Carrier Grade
> Linux "brand"?  And further to that, how does the LF see CGL in
> reference to LSB, specifically on items where they are in disagreement
> (what is right for a carrier environment could easily be the 
> opposite of
> what is right for a desktop environment, for example).
> 
> -- 
> Joe MacDonald, Member of Technical Staff, Linux Products Group, Wind
> River 
> direct 613.270.5750  mobile 613.291.7421  fax 613.592.2283 
> _______________________________________________
> Lf_carrier mailing list
> Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
>