About Linux Collaboration Summit

[CMS063@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Smarduch Mario-CMS063)]

John,
    that's above my pay grade ;( - steering folks are in better position
to
answer (Timo, Peter, Dan, Glenn, ...) . I would think though CP-TA is
not 
a fit. Nice plates, hopefully the cops won't pull you over if CGL falls
through :)
 
- Mario

________________________________

From: John J Grana [mailto:jjg@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:47 PM
To: Smarduch Mario-CMS063
Cc: glenn.seiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chen, Terence;
timo.jokiaho@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit



Mario, 
        Unfortunate about the travel issues... going back to Takashi's
orginal questions, what are the latest thoughts on where CGL is going?
Scope doesn't do specifications and CP-TA likely doesn't want to take on
CGL. With 4.0 done (congrats to all BTW), it seems a shame to let the
situation just "wait around"... Thoughts? Again, is this the forum for
this discussion?? 


Besides, if CGL falls apart, someone owes me $60 for a new license
plate: 



Cheers 
John Grana 
Performance Technologies, Inc. 




"Smarduch Mario-CMS063" <CMS063@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

04/24/2007 03:27 PM 

To
"Chen, Terence" <terence.chen@xxxxxxxxx>, <timo.jokiaho@xxxxxxx>,
<glenn.seiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
cc
lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject
RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit

	




Terence, 
    unfortunately Motorola has frozen travel so I'm not sure who if
anyone 
will be there from Motorola CGL. However I think we're in agreement on 
future direction of CGL and  our views will be represented. 
  
- mario 


________________________________

From: Chen, Terence [mailto:terence.chen@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:31 AM
To: timo.jokiaho@xxxxxxx; glenn.seiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Smarduch Mario-CMS063
Cc: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tim Anderson; Troy Heber
Subject: RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit

Mario, 
  
I plan to be there as well. It will be good if you and Ibrahim can make
it for the discussion. I don't think it is invitation only... 
  
Tim, Troy, will you able to make it? 
  
-Terence 
  

________________________________


From: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
timo.jokiaho@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:51 AM
To: glenn.seiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
CMS063@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit 
  
  

Glenn et.al

Mika Kukkonen and myself will be there representing Nokia Siemens
Networks ... yes, we got invited ;-)

Cheers

 TimoJ

---
Timo Jokiaho +358 50 5002802 Mobile email Nokia E61 Intellisync

----Original message----
From: ext Seiler, Glenn <glenn.seiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: 23-4-2007
To: MacDonald, Joe <Joe.MacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Smarduch Mario-CMS063
<CMS063@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit

Hi Mario;
Yes, this is the event that I mentioned to you in Chicago. It is the
first LF face to face.
I have no idea what to expect, but there is a very preliminary agenda
floating around. It looks to be Thur thru Saturday, with many of the
technical committees on Saturday.

It is invitation only. (Weird?!). I asked Tom Hanrahan to get me an
invite for Joe and another member of my team.
You should have gotten one if you are on the CGL LF mailing list. That
is not the same mailing list as the old OSDL list.

Regards,
-glenn


-----Original Message-----
From: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of
Joe
MacDonald
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 6:41 AM
To: Smarduch Mario-CMS063
Cc: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: About Linux Collaboration Summit

Hey Mario,

On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 09:32 -0400, Smarduch Mario-CMS063 wrote:
> Where and when is it?

I think this is the event Takashi is talking about:

http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Linux_Foundation_Collaboration_Summit
<http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Linux_Foundation_Collaboration_Summi
t> 

"The Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit

We'd like to alert you to the first ever Linux Foundation Collaboration
Summit taking place from June 13 through 15 at Google's Mountain View
Campus in the Bay Area. This unique, invitation-only event will bring
together the brightest minds in the Linux ecosystem to discuss where
Linux is, where it needs to go and how we can all help get it there."

The discussion I've seen on it has been on the VAC mailing list and as
far as I know Glenn has arranged for an invitation to come my way, which
is how I managed to sneak in.  :-)

-J.

>
> - mario
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lf_carrier-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of
Joe
> MacDonald
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 6:43 AM
> To: Takashi Ikebe
> Cc: lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: About Linux Collaboration Summit
>
> Konichiwa Ikebe-san,
>
> On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 18:57 +0900, Takashi Ikebe wrote:
> > Hello CGL members,
> >
> > I would like to know if there are CGL discussion at Linux
> > Collaboration Summit.
> > I also want to know the latest status of CGL-WG.
> > Is this the right list to discuss about CGL?
> > Do you have any plan to attend the Linux Collaboration Summit?
> >
> > It seems there are no discussion on this ML from now..
>
> I'd been thinking the very same thing not too long ago, but I had
> figured there were a couple of reasons for that.  Everyone was taking
a
> break from CGL specification work following the rush of work getting
4.0
> released earlier in the year.  And everyone was still sort of waiting
to
> see what was going to happen with the CGL WG as part of the Linux
> Foundation.
>
> I have a couple of things I'd planned to discuss with the group when
> things picked up again, but hadn't gotten around to sending out an
email
> yet.  I certainly hope this is the right place to discuss CGL working
> group topics since (I think) this is the only mailing list address I
> have associated with the group now.
>
> My schedule is still a little uncertain, but I hope to be at the
summit,
> I should know more soon.  Hope to see everyone there.
>
> -Joe.
> _______________________________________________
> Lf_carrier mailing list
> Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
<https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier> 
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
<https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier> 

_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier
<https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier>
_______________________________________________
Lf_carrier mailing list
Lf_carrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lf_carrier 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/private/lf_carrier/attachments/20070424/09e39dcb/attachment.htm