On 06/08/2012 01:59 PM, Lee Dilkie wrote: > so you say it's not as hard to scan an IPv6 network as the raw math > would indicate but it's still a lot harder than scanning an IPv4 network. The point is that is *feasible*. -- Computers don't complain about doing "harder" work. > Still... where in the article does it say anything about "vast address > space... enables attacks"? > > The title and the article don't match. I might agree. The title was changed pre-publication. -- My original title was something along the lines of "Host scanning in IPv6 networks". Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492