>The attack has some academically interesting details about how cached >credentials work, but I agree with Stefan. If you own the machine, you own >the machine. What's to stop you from, say, simply installing a rootkit? Exactly. More importantly, even if you must make users local admins, there is never *any* reason why the domain administrator should interactively log onto a workstation as the domain administrator anyway. Service personnel log on with support accounts, not the domain admin accounts. If they do, well, then you've got other problems. But in this case even if a domain admin logs in interactively (or via RDP), it's not an issue. Cached credentials can't be used for anything other than to log on to the local machine if there is no DC available. After a domain account logs on to a local system, after AD authenticates the request, then *another* hash is made of the hashed password with *a different salt* each time, for each user cached. As far as the academic interest, cached account behavior is a documented process which has been around for years, local admin overwrite capabilities included. t
