On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
For the record, the original term "O-Day" was coined by a dyslexic security engineer who listened to too much Harry Belafonte while working all night on a drink of rum. It's true. Really. t
Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of previous definitions?
Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc.
We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability".
What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding? non-disclosure?
Gadi.
