Well, I guess that miscommunication sums it up and I apologize (publicly) for being such a snappy brat. For the record though, this isn't something that the company markets at all. We've been doing this for a while and are very selective about who we work with. Hence, why there is no real marketing. I wanted to test the waters and see what kind of response I could get from the community. So far, its been very interesting. On 1/16/07 3:06 PM, "Blue Boar" <BlueBoar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Simon Smith wrote: >> Blue Boar, >> Simply put, and with all due respect, you're wrong. > > About? I see basically two assertions in my note; 1) that I would sell > to iDefense or TippingPoint. Surely you're not going to tell me what I > would do? And 2) That iDefense isn't doing the same thing that Blackhats > are. Is the latter one the one you disagree with? > >> Furthermore I don't >> appreciate you directly or indirectly suggesting that these exploits are >> being sold on the black market, that will never happen on my watch, ever! > > If you look carefully, you'll see I was replying to Kevin, who did make > a comparison to selling to blackhats. I hadn't even seen your note at > the point, and I wasn't replying to you, and I didn't quote anything you > wrote. > > So I assume you think I was saying that your company is selling to > blackhats. I wouldn't think you were. Certainly you don't mean to claim > that, in general, the entire market never sells to blackhats, nor that > you have any control over what others do. > >> More importantly, the company that I am working with is no different >> than iDefense. In fact, they both sell their exploits and harvested research >> to the same people. The only real difference is in the amount of money that >> the researcher realizes when the transactions are complete. This difference >> is a direct result of low corporate overhead. >> >> Lastly, all transactions require that the researcher engage the company >> that I work with in a tight contract. This contract ensures that both >> parties are legitimate and also protects both parties. They don't do that on >> the black market do they? > > So, is the problem that I didn't realize you guys also bought vulns, and > that you pay more? No, I had no idea that you did. I guess some better > marketing is in order. The quarterly challenge thing is pretty good for > publicity, maybe you guys should do one of those. > > BB