In all fairness here, many companies have canned responses to security@whatever and may never actually respond to a sender even if action is being taken. Looking for an actual person to assure something has been recognized as a vulnerability and will be patched is not unreasonable. -sb On 1/6/07, Nicob <nicob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le vendredi 05 janvier 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) a écrit : > Something like security@xxxxxxx may seem obvious, but it's better if you > list specific contact info so it can be easily found. I don't want to be rude but : - security@xxxxxxxxxx is the only standardized security contact (as defined by RFC 2142) - googling security@xxxxxxx would bring some results - this was already answered on the Full-Disclosure mailing list - the OSVDB Vendor Dictionary contains a record for SAP - even the SecurityFocus site has some references to this email address : http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/415 Nicob
