Thanks for pointing this out JP, it does in fact look confusing. We determined during the Digital Vaccine filter creation process that a previously released filter was robust enough to block the attack without further modification and the vendor was immeditately notified. ZDI Team "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@xxxxxxxxx> 11/30/2006 05:02 AM To zdi-disclosures/F/US/3Com@3Com cc full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject Re: [Full-disclosure] ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow Vulnerability On 11/29/06, zdi-disclosures@xxxxxxxx <zdi-disclosures@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > ZDI-06-043: Novell Netware Client Print Provider Buffer Overflow > Vulnerability > http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-06-043.html > November 29, 2006 <snip> > -- Disclosure Timeline: > 2005.07.07 - Digital Vaccine released to TippingPoint customers > 2006.10.02 - Vulnerability reported to vendor > 2006.11.29 - Coordinated public release of advisory you waited over a year to report it to the vendor? sounds like analyzing your digital vaccine rules might yield a slew of reproducible 0 days that vendors are unaware of..... -JP<who is admittedly unaware of the tippingpoint vaccine format, and about how much info can be gleaned from it>
