Jesper's Blog : More options on protecting against recent IE
vulnerabilities on a domain:
http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2006/09/22/More-options-on-protecting-against-the-VML-vulnerability-on-a-domain.aspx
I like that option better. Leaves me supported and honestly I've not
seen anything that I'm running that's used VML or freaked since I've
done that?
Gadi Evron wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Bill Stout wrote:
http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2006/09/seen-in-wild-zero-day-exploit-be
ing.html
"This exploit can be mitigated by turning off Javascripting.
Update: Turning off Javascripting is no longer a valid mitigation. A
valid mitigation is unregistering the VML dll. "
There is, of course, the ZERT (Zeroday Emergency Response Team) patch,
available to those who choose to use it.
Along with source code, testing methodology, etc.
Naturally a vendor patch is BETTER, this is merely an alternative that can
be used, right now, by those who choose to do so.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2019162,00.asp
http://isotf.org/zert/
Richard wrote an interesting blog entry on it:
http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2006/09/zert-evolution.html
Bill Stout
Gadi.
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs
