On 23 Jun 2006 at 10:35, Vincent Archer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:08:56AM +0200, Amit Klein (AKsecurity) wrote: > > So what I don't understand now is why IE's "solution" is any better than Opera/Firefox? > > > > Why is modifying the data (msb) any better than modifying the data-description (charset)? > > The same problem did exist in RFC821, which specified the data path as > being 7-bit, with the MSB set to 0. The venerable ancestor sendmail did > enforce that, by and-ing each and every byte with 0x7F, which means that > the IE solution is "slightly better", due to historical precedent. > If we're into precedences, does anyone know what Mosaic 1.0 used to do in such case? after all, it was probably the first widely used browser (see http://www.livinginternet.com/w/wi_browse.htm), and it made some sense (in the early 90s) to conform to its de-facto browser standard. > Not that it's good anyway. > Yep... -Amit