-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Benjamin R. Ginter wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why you did not specify which > backends are vulnerable? My apologies... The advisory specifically applies to the DB and LDAP Auth Containers. Both of which are exploitable. No exploitable vulnerabilities have been found in the other containers yet. Cheers, Matt Van Gundy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD/NT1fdMeesRSEA0RA3XjAJ0V1wqrMPrQMDC/DLg2wc5i25/DPwCfUZ5e P7vL5QvOwRjjFCdZSxfi/ok= =0/dK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
