Re: On classifying attacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Forte Systems - Iosif Peterfi wrote:

> Ok, so let's split them like this:
> 
> 1. Simple
>   1.1 Remote
>   1.2 Local
> 2. Compound
>   2.1 Social engineered
>   2.2 Technical
>   2.3 Local
> 
> [...]
> Does this makes sense to anyone ?!

I use "Active" instead of "Simple" and "Passive" instead of "Compound",
but it's globally the same. "Compound"/"Passive" require the attacker to
wait for something else to happen. That leaves me with:

Remote Active
Local Active
Remote Passive (Social engineered)
Remote Passive (Technical)
Local Passive

-- 
Koon

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Security]     [Netfilter]     [PHP]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux