Re: /dev/random is probably not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thomas Wana <thomas@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: /dev/random is probably not
From: McLain Causey <mclaincausey@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 22:48:50 -0500
Cc: "Charles M. Hannum" <mycroft@xxxxxxxxxx>, bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42C69FCD.10403@wana.at>
References: <200507011710.35815.mycroft@netbsd.org> <42C69FCD.10403@wana.at>

*BSD uses Yarrow I think. Should also be safe from the concernsmentioned.


http://www.schneier.com/yarrow.html


On Jul 2, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Thomas Wana wrote:

  OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and the like, and of course
  Windows family OSs.

References:
- /dev/random is probably not
  - From: Charles M. Hannum
- Re: /dev/random is probably not
  - From: Thomas Wana

Prev by Date: Three More Vulnerable to PHPXMLRPC code injection
Next by Date: XMLRPC remote commands execute exploit
Previous by thread: Re: /dev/random is probably not
Next by thread: Re: /dev/random is probably not
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Security] [Netfilter] [PHP] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel]

Powered by Linux