> > From: Frank Bures [mailto:lisfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:41 AM > > When user connects the same patch cable to two ports of the > > switch, the > > switch will ultimately bring down hierarchically higher > > branches of the > > LAN. > > Ours is a rather large LAN. One part of it is served by > > Extreme Networks > > switches. None of the SGI machines behind these switches > > were affected by > > the short. In fact no adverse effects were observed in that > > part of the > > LAN. This is natural behaviour of Ethernet ("natural" being dependent of your network design, of course :) and has nothing to do with D-Link or any other manufacturer. Some switches offer automatic port disabling feature if BPDU is received on a port defined as access port. All workstation ports should be defined as access ports for this to work. Workstations are not taking part of any Spanning Tree and they shouldn't generate any BPDUs and thus BPDUs shouldn't come into the switch from any access port. When you interconnect two switch ports defined as access ports, BPDUs generated by the switch reach another access port and trigger the disabling feature. This works in case or a single switch as well as between different switches as long as all your switches are Spanning Tree enabled. How the "short-circuit" affects specific switches depends how their unknown frame forwarding is configured and where they stand in a multi-tier switch topology. > > In my opinion, a switch should be immune to this admittedly insane > > manipulation. Otherwise, one can DoS the entire network just > > by shorting > > two RJ-45 network outlets in one's office together. Switches _are_ immune to insane manipulation if configured correctly. Excluding plugging out the power cord, unfortunately... -tarmo-
