>On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 13:16, Nicholas Knight wrote:
>> Unrealistic? It is a *voting system*! It does exactly *one* *very*
>> *simple* thing! If it cannot do it bug-free, its developers are
>> incompetent and should not be allowed anywhere near a compiler, much
>> less the key to democracy.
>
>Thank you. This is the most rational post I've seen.
>
>if(VoteForBush) { bush++; }
>elseif(VoteForKerry) { kerry++; }
>elseif(VoteForNader) { nader++; }
>
>Is not tough. Diebold's refusal to allow the world to see that is highly
>suspicious. I suppose I'll get sued under the DMCA for posting their
>intellectual property now... Or maybe I have to change line 2 to:
>elseif(VoteForKerry) { bush++; } first... There, let the lawsuits rain
You are underestimating the compexity of the system.
Surely a touch screen is involved or some other device and
an operating systems.
Surely it's just a minor matter of programming of either the
touchscreen
window system
OS
to recognize a voting screen and redirect the input
events to different buttons.
A touch screen can do this by sending wrong coordinates
and then fake output.
A window system can do this by sending the even to the
wrong button and doing some I/O substitution.
All a minor matter of programming.
And as other have said; as an ordinary voter you have to
trust people who verified the voting system unless you
get a paper copy of your ballot which you can put in the backup
bin.
Casper
