Am Di, den 21.09.2004 schrieb pressinfo@xxxxxxxxxxx um 17:05: > In-Reply-To: <20040831203815.13871.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Diebold strongly refutes the existence of any "back doors" or "hidden codes" > in its GEMS software. These inaccurate allegations appear to stem from those not > familiar with the product, misunderstanding the purpose of legitimate structures > in the database. These structures are well documented and have been reviewed > (including at a source code level) by independent testing authorities as required > by federal election regulations. Last thing I remember is that these "reviews" resulted in a rather devastating verdict for the product. Would you like to provide a link to an updated, independant review ? Having the source-code opened would help, too. Also, IIRC, your company is now being sued at least by one US-state over "false claims". cheers, Rainer -- =================================================== ~ Rainer Duffner - rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ~ ~ Freising - Munich - Germany ~ ~ Unix - Linux - BSD - OpenSource - Security ~ ~ http://www.ultra-secure.de/~rainer/pubkey.pgp ~ ===================================================
