> -----Original Message----- > From: Anything But Microsoft [mailto:abm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:43 PM > To: <@securityfocus.com BUGTRAQ > Cc: secure@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Microsoft technologies. By default, non-HIPAA compliant? > > > The US health care system is the only industry where best network and > security practices are a federally mandated requirement. Um, no. I work in the banking industry and we are federally regulated and audited for security. I've never worked in the medical industry but I'd be surprised if their requirements are more stringent than ours. > My view is that any health care provider using replaceable Microsoft > technologies is not HIPAA compliant, in regards to privacy or security > of patient data. I've heard this type of comment about using MS products in banking. It is my understanding (and I am *not* an expert) that if an entity (banking, medical, whatever) reasonably attempts to keep up with security patches, AV updates and the like, that they are compliant with federal requirements. IANAL, and I don't work with the compliance team, this is just my understanding through casual conversation. Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT Assistant Vice President Linux Design and Engineering Bank of America (972) 997-9641 The opinions expressed in this message to not necessarily reflect those of my employer, Bank of America.
