Check this out http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~mortehu/files.txt This seem the dir of the Windows source code, I dont know if it a hoax. And here is a torrent where it seem to be the source http://www.skittlebrau.org/ring0_src.tar.bz2.torrent This is all the information I have until now Regards On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:59:22 -0800 <tlarholm@pivx.com> wrote: > This is not the first time that people have reported leaked copies of > Windows source code. In 2000, Wired News reported that the source code > for Whistler (now Windows XP) had been leaked, though they never > confirmed it. > > http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35135,00.html > > WinBeta is also reporting on the new leak > > http://www.winbeta.org/winbeta/forums/index.php?showtopic=2663&st=0&#ent > ry9449 > > 0-day exploits being used on Microsofts network, foul play by privileged > partners or a hoax? Let's see what Microsoft reports. > > > > Regards > > Thor Larholm > Senior Security Researcher > PivX Solutions > 24 Corporate Plaza #180 > Newport Beach, CA 92660 > http://www.pivx.com > thor@pivx.com > Phone: +1 (949) 231-8496 > PGP: 0x5A276569 > 6BB1 B77F CB62 0D3D 5A82 C65D E1A4 157C 5A27 6569 > > PivX defines "Proactive Threat Mitigation". Get a FREE Beta Version of > Qwik-Fix > <http://www.qwik-fix.net> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge@egotistical.reprehensible.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:49 PM > To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com > Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com; Thor Larholm > Subject: W2K source "leaked"? > > > A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source > making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks, I was hoping it would take > a bit longer for it to be "out", but that was just day-dreaming. > > Thor Larholm just gave me this URL, as you can notice, the server is > busy: http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=17509 > > I never believed in 0-days. "New" or more to the point > un-known-to-the-public exploits and vulnerabilities exist and are being > used. > In my opinion "0-days" virtually don't exist. It's usually either some > vulnerability that is long known and a COP or a worm is created. Or > exploits that will nearly never see the "public" but exist and are used > by few individuals.. but now... I don't know. > > How often does a brand new exploit come out without prior warning and > "attack" the net? > > *If* this really is the.. _real_ source code for W2K (and according to > the article NT4 as well).... we'll see what happens next. > > People didn't need help finding vulnerabilities in Windows before, but > it just became a whole lot easier and a lot less demanding on the "m4d > #4x0r 5k111z". > > I can't really say that the article is right and the source was "leaked" > > or "stolen". The source is being sold/given (?) for years now to EDU's > and commercial companies for research purposes (not to mention China..). > > I suppose foul play is always possible. > > Can anyone confirm this is the real source code? How about a press > release? :) > > Gadi Evron > -- ============================ it's so easy to forget me
