Re: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet Explorer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Depends.  Does it include the tools necessary to sign my own code?

>> If so, what's to stop a malware creator from using those same tools
>> to sign the attack vector?

> How does the malware author get the private half of a public key you
> trust for software installations?

The same way you do, of course.  Most likely it pops up a box asking
for it.  Given how boneheaded most users seem to be, and given that
signatures will be needed on most software installs, this will be a
common sight to many users, and they will probably cheerfully type in
whatever is necessary to fetch/decrypt it.  Look at how effective
phishing attacks are.

No, that wouldn't work against me (or, I would hope, you).  But I
wouldn't be running such a thing anyway, and even if I were-- having to
type a passphrase every time I recompiled something would be
intolerable, and if it were automated, malware could automate the
signing just as well as my compiler front-end could.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Security]     [Netfilter]     [PHP]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux