Re: vulnerabilities of postscript printers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



der Mouse wrote:
Third, it would not be easy to usurp control of the printer's CPU to
start with.  PostScript jobs are run in a relatively restricted
virtual-machine environment, and it is difficult for a job to affect
the environment provided for future jobs - generally, it needs to
provide the correct value for a 32-bit "password".  (Such things can be
set insecurely, certainly, but that's no different, really, from having
a Unix box with root's password set to "root": it's admin error.)

The undocumented, machine-specific cexec interface allows the downloading and execution of binary images which are run by the RIP CPU. It's purpose, I was told, was to allow drivers to patch bugs in the firmware if needed, but it's most (in)famous use was Apple's Laserwriter bitmap smoothing code which ran natively on the LW's 68000 for speed.


If you could figured out the cexec encryption - and I'd bet money it was very similar to the now-documented eexec encryption - running code natively on the RIP's CPU would be fairly easy.

It's been several years since I looked, but cexec was present on most "genuine Adobe" firmwares I investigated.

--
Ian Farquhar
Senior Network Security Engineer
Network Security Group
Sun Microsystems
Level 2, 828 Pacific Hwy
Gordon, NSW, 2072
Australia

Email:  ian.farquhar@sun.com
Phone:  +61 2 9498 0470 (External)
Phone:  57470 (Sun Internal)
Mobile: +61 414 967 178
Fax:    +61 2 9498 0460


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Security]     [Netfilter]     [PHP]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux