I believe that Mr. Raadt meant PAX by W^X. We all enjoy ascii art but I wanted to note that renaming somebody elses work is not so ethical. so for the real thing please consider checking: http://pageexec.virtualave.net/ my linux box have 0 remotely exploitable vulnerabilities in its default install since the begining of time and space. thanks to segmentation, ASLR from the PAX project. Thanks, - noir -----Original Message----- From: Theo de Raadt [mailto:deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:37 PM To: Mariusz Woloszyn Subject: Re: Buffer overflow prevention > I believe the best protection (at this time) is to combine ProPolice > with a W^X technology.
