Re: Positive Technologies Security Advisory 2003-0307: DoS-attack in Kerio WinRoute Firewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:00:26AM +0400, Dmitry Maksimov wrote:
[snip]
> Positive  Technologies  reports that single simple HTTP request to Kerio
> Winroute Firewall Web administration interface (TCP/4080)
> 
> GET / HTTP/1.0
> Authorization: Basic XXX
>  
> instead of correct one:
> 
> GET / HTTP/1.0
> Host: server
> Authorization: Basic XXX
> 
> 
> causes 100% CPU utilization of attacked computer.

Hmm.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but IMHO version 1.0 of the HTTP protocol
does *not* require a Host header in the request.  The Host header is a
requirement in HTTP/1.1 for virtual hosting, isn't it?  Thus, an
HTTP/1.0 request without a Host header is perfectly valid, and expected.
This would mean that this application breaks not only on invalid
requests, but also on legitimate ones.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@sbnd.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
I am jealous of the first word in this sentence.

Attachment: pgp00330.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Security]     [Netfilter]     [PHP]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux