In-Reply-To: <20030305194707.15514.qmail@www.securityfocus.com> in reference to the cworld article, i would say some1 is kinda confused around here.....:) The "russian hacker web site" is actually www.security.nnov.ru, a well known infosec news and advisory site, not in the business of "producing" exploits for the mass. They actually made public the advisory from LDS (i would try to confuse a polish guy with a russian one ;) http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/news.asp?binid=2630 On my opinion, all this rumors surondin the famous sendmail exploit, are not meant to aware and alert ppl about risk but to actually misinform them and produce terror (and the involved "necesary?"investment on trying to "fix this") i also was truly surprised after reading the comments form ppl like Ingevaldson from x-force ensuring "analysis of the code shows that it works" or Eric Allman saying "...there are other variables that are not pointers that have security implications; finding one of them within range will be more difficult, but probably not impossible..." (without specify what kind of risk he founds behind this). The kind of comments that provide companies subjective risk indications, are just a tool against ppl trying to be serious about risk management security investment. >Received: (qmail 19838 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 20:19:16 -0000 >Received: from outgoing3.securityfocus.com (205.206.231.27) > by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 20:19:16 -0000 >Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.19]) > by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP > id 48EAAA30A4; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:17:45 -0700 (MST) >Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm >Precedence: bulk >List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com> >List-Post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com> >List-Help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> >List-Subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com> >Delivered-To: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com >Delivered-To: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com >Received: (qmail 25559 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 19:39:05 -0000 >Date: 5 Mar 2003 19:47:07 -0000 >Message-ID: <20030305194707.15514.qmail@www.securityfocus.com> >Content-Type: text/plain >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404) >From: Kryptik Logik <kryptiklogik@hushmail.com> >To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com >Subject: Sendmail exploit released??? > > > >Folks: > >Refer to this article in ComputerWorld >http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/holes/story/0,10801,7 9 >021,00.html about some Russian Hacker site releasing Sendmail exploit >code. Is it any different than the LSD exploit code or is is a "security- >guru-security-know-all" reporters mistake?! > >The reason this caught my attention is that they say that the exploit has >been tested only on Slackware Linux 8.0 dist just like LSD advisory says > >This article claims that the Russian hackers wrote it and released it on >the web first... which kinda irks me off :( > ><quote from the article> >... "self-proclaimed security experts located in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, >actually produced the exploit and posted it on the Web" ><unquote> > >Can anybody confirm/deny this? > ># klogik >
