David Mirza Ahmad Symantec 0x26005712 8D 9A B1 33 82 3D B3 D0 40 EB AB F0 1E 67 C6 1A 26 00 57 12 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:04:01 -0800 From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com> To: saag@mit.edu Subject: [saag] Of potential interest -- Citibank tries to gag crypto bug disclosure >To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk >Subject: Citibank tries to gag crypto bug disclosure >Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:57:34 +0000 >From: Ross Anderson <Ross.Anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk> > > >Citibank is trying to get an order in the High Court today gagging >public disclosure of crypto vulnerabilities: > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/citibank_gag.pdf > >I have written to the judge opposing the order: > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/citibank_response.pdf > >The background is that my student Mike Bond has discovered some really >horrendous vulnerabilities in the cryptographic equipment commonly >used to protect the PINs used to identify customers to cash machines: > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-560.pdf > >These vulnerabilities mean that bank insiders can almost trivially >find out the PINs of any or all customers. The discoveries happened >while Mike and I were working as expert witnesses on a `phantom >withdrawal' case. > >The vulnerabilities are also scientifically interesting: > > http://cryptome.org/pacc.htm > >For the last couple of years or so there has been a rising tide of >phantoms. I get emails with increasing frequency from people all over >the world whose banks have debited them for ATM withdrawals that they >deny making. Banks in many countries simply claim that their systems >are secure and so the customers must be responsible. It now looks like >some of these vulnerabilities have also been discovered by the bad >guys. Our courts and regulators should make the banks fix their >systems, rather than just lying about security and dumping the costs >on the customers. > >Curiously enough, Citi was also the bank in the case that set US law >on phantom withdrawals from ATMs (Judd v Citibank). They lost. I hope >that's an omen, if not a precedent ... > >Ross Anderson Robert Moskowitz TruSecure Corporation Security Interest EMail: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com _______________________________________________ saag mailing list saag@mit.edu https://jis.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/saag