Hi Andrii, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrii-Nakryiko/bpf-improve-JEQ-JNE-branch-taken-logic/20231019-122550 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019042405.2971130-8-andrii%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231019/202310191409.pIIb2buD-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310191409.pIIb2buD-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ # many are suggestions rather than must-fix WARNING:NEW_TYPEDEFS: do not add new typedefs #169: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:21: +typedef unsigned long long ___u64; WARNING:NEW_TYPEDEFS: do not add new typedefs #170: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:22: +typedef unsigned int ___u32; WARNING:NEW_TYPEDEFS: do not add new typedefs #171: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:23: +typedef long long ___s64; WARNING:NEW_TYPEDEFS: do not add new typedefs #172: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:24: +typedef int ___s32; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #215: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:67: + case U64: return (u64)x < (u64)y ? (u64)x : (u64)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #216: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:68: + case U32: return (u32)x < (u32)y ? (u32)x : (u32)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #217: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:69: + case S64: return (s64)x < (s64)y ? (s64)x : (s64)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #218: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:70: + case S32: return (s32)x < (s32)y ? (s32)x : (s32)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #219: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:71: + default: printf("min_t!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'min_t', this function's name, in a string #219: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:71: + default: printf("min_t!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #226: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:78: + case U64: return (u64)x > (u64)y ? (u64)x : (u64)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #227: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:79: + case U32: return (u32)x > (u32)y ? (u32)x : (u32)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #228: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:80: + case S64: return (s64)x > (s64)y ? (s64)x : (s64)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #229: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:81: + case S32: return (s32)x > (s32)y ? (u32)(s32)x : (u32)(s32)y; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #230: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:82: + default: printf("max_t!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'max_t', this function's name, in a string #230: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:82: + default: printf("max_t!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #241: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:93: + default: printf("t_str!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 't_str', this function's name, in a string #241: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:93: + default: printf("t_str!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #252: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:104: + default: printf("t_is_32!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 't_is_32', this function's name, in a string #252: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:104: + default: printf("t_is_32!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #263: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:115: + default: printf("t_signed!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 't_signed', this function's name, in a string #263: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:115: + default: printf("t_signed!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #274: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:126: + default: printf("t_unsigned!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 't_unsigned', this function's name, in a string #274: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:126: + default: printf("t_unsigned!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #285: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:137: + default: printf("num_is_small!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'num_is_small', this function's name, in a string #285: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:137: + default: printf("num_is_small!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #299: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:151: + default: printf("snprintf_num!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'snprintf_num', this function's name, in a string #299: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:151: + default: printf("snprintf_num!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #339: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:191: + default: printf("snprintf_num!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'snprintf_num', this function's name, in a string #339: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:191: + default: printf("snprintf_num!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #386: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:238: + default: printf("unkn_subreg!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'unkn_subreg', this function's name, in a string #386: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:238: + default: printf("unkn_subreg!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #397: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:249: + default: printf("range!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range', this function's name, in a string #397: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:249: + default: printf("range!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #454: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:306: + default: printf("range_cast_u64!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range_cast_u64', this function's name, in a string #454: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:306: + default: printf("range_cast_u64!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #476: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:328: + default: printf("range_cast_s64!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range_cast_s64', this function's name, in a string #476: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:328: + default: printf("range_cast_s64!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #493: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:345: + default: printf("range_cast_u32!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range_cast_u32', this function's name, in a string #493: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:345: + default: printf("range_cast_u32!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #510: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:362: + default: printf("range_cast_s32!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range_cast_s32', this function's name, in a string #510: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:362: + default: printf("range_cast_s32!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #526: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:378: + default: printf("range_cast!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'range_cast', this function's name, in a string #526: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:378: + default: printf("range_cast!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #537: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:389: + default: printf("is_valid_num!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'is_valid_num', this function's name, in a string #537: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:389: + default: printf("is_valid_num!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #551: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:403: + default: printf("is_valid_range!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'is_valid_range', this function's name, in a string #551: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:403: + default: printf("is_valid_range!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #606: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:458: + default: printf("complement_op!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'complement_op', this function's name, in a string #606: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:458: + default: printf("complement_op!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #619: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:471: + default: printf("op_str!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'op_str', this function's name, in a string #619: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:471: + default: printf("op_str!\n"); exit(1); ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #638: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:490: + default: printf("range_canbe op %d\n", op); exit(1); \ ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #643: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:495: + case U64: { range_canbe(u64); } ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #644: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:496: + case U32: { range_canbe(u32); } ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #645: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:497: + case S64: { range_canbe(s64); } ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #646: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:498: + case S32: { range_canbe(s32); } ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #647: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:499: + default: printf("range_canbe!\n"); exit(1); WARNING:LINE_SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations #933: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:785: + struct bpf_insn insns[64]; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts, ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1014: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:866: + case OP_LT: op_code = spec.compare_signed ? BPF_JSLT : BPF_JLT; break; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1015: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:867: + case OP_LE: op_code = spec.compare_signed ? BPF_JSLE : BPF_JLE; break; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1016: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:868: + case OP_GT: op_code = spec.compare_signed ? BPF_JSGT : BPF_JGT; break; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1017: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:869: + case OP_GE: op_code = spec.compare_signed ? BPF_JSGE : BPF_JGE; break; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1018: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:870: + case OP_EQ: op_code = BPF_JEQ; break; ERROR:TRAILING_STATEMENTS: trailing statements should be on next line #1019: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:871: + case OP_NE: op_code = BPF_JNE; break; WARNING:BRACES: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks #1153: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:1005: + for (t = MIN_T; t <= MAX_T; t++) { + reg->r[t] = range(t, sval, sval); + } WARNING:BRACES: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks #1559: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:1411: + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(lower_seeds); j++) { + uvals[cnt++] = (((u64)upper_seeds[i]) << 32) | lower_seeds[j]; + } ERROR:OPEN_BRACE: that open brace { should be on the previous line #1566: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:1418: + for (i = 1, j = 0; i < cnt; i++) + { WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 8) #1665: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:1517: + for (i = 0; i < val_cnt; i++) + for (j = 0; j < range_cnt; j++) WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 8) #1666: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c:1518: + for (j = 0; j < range_cnt; j++) + for (cond_t = MIN_T; cond_t <= MAX_T; cond_t++) { -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
