From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
With pcpu_alloc_size() in place, check whether or not the size of
the dynamic per-cpu area is matched with unit_size.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 3037f3e809d8..e52ef1e106ae 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -497,21 +497,17 @@ static int check_obj_size(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, unsigned int idx)
struct llist_node *first;
unsigned int obj_size;
- /* For per-cpu allocator, the size of free objects in free list doesn't
- * match with unit_size and now there is no way to get the size of
- * per-cpu pointer saved in free object, so just skip the checking.
- */
- if (c->percpu_size)
- return 0;
-
first = c->free_llist.first;
if (!first)
return 0;
- obj_size = ksize(first);
+ if (c->percpu_size)
+ obj_size = pcpu_alloc_size(((void **)first)[1]);
+ else
+ obj_size = ksize(first);
if (obj_size != c->unit_size) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "bpf_mem_cache[%u]: unexpected object size %u, expect %u\n",
- idx, obj_size, c->unit_size);
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "bpf_mem_cache[%u]: percpu %d, unexpected object size %u, expect %u\n",
+ idx, c->percpu_size, obj_size, c->unit_size);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
@@ -979,6 +975,12 @@ void notrace *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags)
return !ret ? NULL : ret + LLIST_NODE_SZ;
}
+/* The alignment of dynamic per-cpu area is 8, so c->unit_size and the
+ * actual size of dynamic per-cpu area will always be matched and there is
+ * no need to adjust size_index for per-cpu allocation. However for the
+ * simplicity of the implementation, use an unified size_index for both
+ * kmalloc and per-cpu allocation.
+ */
static __init int bpf_mem_cache_adjust_size(void)
{
unsigned int size;
--
2.29.2
