Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling CPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed,  4 Oct 2023 11:23:37 -0500 you wrote:
> BPF supports creating high resolution timers using bpf_timer_* helper
> functions. Currently, only the BPF_F_TIMER_ABS flag is supported, which
> specifies that the timeout should be interpreted as absolute time. It
> would also be useful to be able to pin that timer to a core. For
> example, if you wanted to make a subset of cores run without timer
> interrupts, and only have the timer be invoked on a single core.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Add ability to pin bpf timer to calling CPU
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d6247ecb6c1e
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to a core
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0d7ae0686075

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux