Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:50 +0200

On 10/4/23 2:07 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
The following test_progs now pass, which were previously broken:

   | 13      bpf_cookie
   | 19      bpf_mod_race
   | 68      deny_namespace
   | 119     libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
   | 135     lookup_key
   | 137     lsm_cgroup
   | 284     test_lsm

Thanks for the fixes, took them into bpf tree. I was wondering whether this could be
backed by specific tests, but looks like the above list already takes care of it.

Thanks,
Daniel