Hi,
On 10/7/2023 10:04 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:51:01 +0800 Hou Tao <houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Introduce alloc_size_percpu() to get the size of the dynamic per-cpu
>> area. It will be used by bpf memory allocator in the following patches.
>> BPF memory allocator maintains multiple per-cpu area caches for multiple
>> area sizes and it needs the size of dynamic per-cpu area to select the
>> corresponding cache when bpf program frees the dynamic per-cpu area.
>>
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2244,6 +2244,35 @@ static void pcpu_balance_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>> mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * alloc_size_percpu - the size of the dynamic percpu area
>> + * @ptr: pointer to the dynamic percpu area
>> + *
>> + * Return the size of the dynamic percpu area @ptr.
>> + *
>> + * RETURNS:
>> + * The size of the dynamic percpu area.
>> + *
>> + * CONTEXT:
>> + * Can be called from atomic context.
>> + */
>> +size_t alloc_size_percpu(void __percpu *ptr)
>> +{
>> + struct pcpu_chunk *chunk;
>> + int bit_off, end;
> It's minor, but I'd suggest unsigned long for both.
Thanks for this and all following suggestions. Will do in v2.
>
>> + void *addr;
>> +
>> + if (!ptr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + addr = __pcpu_ptr_to_addr(ptr);
>> + /* No pcpu_lock here: ptr has not been freed, so chunk is still alive */
>> + chunk = pcpu_chunk_addr_search(addr);
>> + bit_off = (addr - chunk->base_addr) / PCPU_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE;
> void* - void* is a ptrdiff_t, which is long or int.
>
>> + end = find_next_bit(chunk->bound_map, pcpu_chunk_map_bits(chunk), bit_off + 1);
> find_next_bit takes an unsigned long
>
>> + return (end - bit_off) * PCPU_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE;
> And then we don't need to worry about signedness issues.
>
>> +}
>> +
