On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 11:05, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.6 release. > > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.6-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > The following kernel warning was noticed on qemu-armv7 while booting > with kselftest merge configs enabled build on stable-rc 6.5.6-rc1. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > bpf: Ensure unit_size is matched with slab cache object size > > > bpf: Ensure unit_size is matched with slab cache object size > [ Upstream commit c930472552022bd09aab3cd946ba3f243070d5c7 ] > > [ 2.525383] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 2.525743] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:385 > bpf_mem_alloc_init+0x3b0/0x3b4 > [ 2.527241] bpf_mem_cache[0]: unexpected object size 128, expect 96 Anders investigated this report and picked up the following patches to solve the reported problem. d52b59315bf5e bpf: Adjust size_index according to the value of KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE b1d53958b6931 bpf: Don't prefill for unused bpf_mem_cache c930472552022 bpf: Ensure unit_size is matched with slab cache object size - Naresh