Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/xdp: fix zero-size allocation warning in xskq_create()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/3/23 12:29 AM, Andrew Kanner wrote:
Syzkaller reported the following issue:
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2807 at mm/vmalloc.c:3247 __vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3361)
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 2807 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #12
  Hardware name: Generic DT based system
  unwind_backtrace from show_stack (arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:258)
  show_stack from dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 1))
  dump_stack_lvl from __warn (kernel/panic.c:633 kernel/panic.c:680)
  __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt (./include/linux/context_tracking.h:153 kernel/panic.c:700)
  warn_slowpath_fmt from __vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3361 (discriminator 3))
  __vmalloc_node_range from vmalloc_user (mm/vmalloc.c:3478)
  vmalloc_user from xskq_create (net/xdp/xsk_queue.c:40)
  xskq_create from xsk_setsockopt (net/xdp/xsk.c:953 net/xdp/xsk.c:1286)
  xsk_setsockopt from __sys_setsockopt (net/socket.c:2308)
  __sys_setsockopt from ret_fast_syscall (arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:68)

xskq_get_ring_size() uses struct_size() macro to safely calculate the
size of struct xsk_queue and q->nentries of desc members. But the
syzkaller repro was able to set q->nentries with the value initially
taken from copy_from_sockptr() high enough to return SIZE_MAX by
struct_size(). The next PAGE_ALIGN(size) is such case will overflow
the size_t value and set it to 0. This will trigger WARN_ON_ONCE in
vmalloc_user() -> __vmalloc_node_range().

The issue is reproducible on 32-bit arm kernel.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+fae676d3cf469331fc89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000c84b4705fb31741e@xxxxxxxxxx/T/
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fae676d3cf469331fc89
Fixes: 9f78bf330a66 ("xsk: support use vaddr as ring")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@xxxxxxxxx>

I guess also:

Reported-by: syzbot+b132693e925cbbd89e26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Moreover, this fix is needed in bpf/net tree (as opposed to *-next tree), right?

  net/xdp/xsk_queue.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.c b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.c
index f8905400ee07..b03d1bfb6978 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.c
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ struct xsk_queue *xskq_create(u32 nentries, bool umem_queue)
  	q->ring_mask = nentries - 1;
size = xskq_get_ring_size(q, umem_queue);
+	if (unlikely(size == SIZE_MAX))
+		return NULL;

Doesn't this leak q here ?

  	size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
q->ring = vmalloc_user(size);






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux