Le 29/09/2023 à 11:25, Christian Brauner a écrit : >> I fear that creating a new mount ns for each net ns will introduce more problems. > > Not sure if we're talking past each other but that is what's happening > now. Each new ip netns exec invocation will allocate a _new_ mount > namespace. In other words, if you have 300 ip netns exec commands > running then there will be 300 individual mount namespaces active. > > What I tried to say is that ip netns exec could be changed to > _optionally_ allocate a prepared mount namespace that is shared between > ip netns exec commands. And yeah, that would need to be a new command > line addition to ip netns exec. Ok, you talked about changing 'ip netns exec', not adding an option, thus I thought that you suggested adding this unconditionally ;-) I was asking myself how to propagate mount points between the parent and 'ip netns exec' (both way), but this may be another use case than Toke's use case. Regards, Nicolas
