Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] riscv, bpf: Add necessary Zbb instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add necessary Zbb instructions introduced by [0] to reduce code size and
> improve performance of RV64 JIT. Meanwhile, a runtime deteted helper is
> added to check whether the CPU supports Zbb instructions.
>
> Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf [0]
> Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 8e0ef4d08..4e24fb2bd 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ static inline bool rvc_enabled(void)
>  	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool rvzbb_enabled(void)
> +{
> +	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB);
> +}
> +
>  enum {
>  	RV_REG_ZERO =	0,	/* The constant value 0 */
>  	RV_REG_RA =	1,	/* Return address */
> @@ -727,6 +732,27 @@ static inline u16 rvc_swsp(u32 imm8, u8 rs2)
>  	return rv_css_insn(0x6, imm, rs2, 0x2);
>  }
>  
> +/* RVZBB instrutions. */
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_sextb(u8 rd, u8 rs1)
> +{
> +	return rv_i_insn(0x604, rs1, 1, rd, 0x13);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_sexth(u8 rd, u8 rs1)
> +{
> +	return rv_i_insn(0x605, rs1, 1, rd, 0x13);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_zexth(u8 rd, u8 rs)
> +{
> +	return rv_i_insn(0x80, rs, 4, rd, __riscv_xlen == 64 ? 0x3b : 0x33);

Encoding funcs are hard to read as it is, so let's try to be a bit more
explicit.

I would prefer a

  |        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
  |                return 64bitvariant
  |         return 32bitvariant

version.

Or a 64-bit only variant elsewhere, since this series is only aimed for
64-bit anyway.

> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_rev8(u8 rd, u8 rs)
> +{
> +	return rv_i_insn(__riscv_xlen == 64 ? 0x6b8 : 0x698, rs, 5, rd, 0x13);

Dito.



Björn





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux