Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] Allocate bpf trampoline on bpf_prog_pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 14:53 -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> This set enables allocating bpf trampoline from bpf_prog_pack on x86.
> The
> majority of this work, however, is the refactoring of trampoline
> code.
> This is needed because we need to handle 4 archs and 2 users
> (trampoline
> and struct_ops).
> 
> 1/8 is a dependency that is already applied to bpf tree.
> 2/8 through 7/8 refactors trampoline code. A few helpers are added.
> 8/8 finally let bpf trampoline on x86 use bpf_prog_pack.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Add missing changes in net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c.
> 2. Reduce one dry run in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline. (Xu Kuohai)
> 3. Other small fixes.
> 
> Song Liu (8):
>   s390/bpf: Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return program size
>   bpf: Let bpf_prog_pack_free handle any pointer
>   bpf: Adjust argument names of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()
>   bpf: Add helpers for trampoline image management
>   bpf, x86: Adjust arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return value
>   bpf: Add arch_bpf_trampoline_size()
>   bpf: Use arch_bpf_trampoline_size
>   x86, bpf: Use bpf_prog_pack for bpf trampoline
> 
>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   |  55 +++++++++-----
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c |  24 ++++---
>  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c    |  43 ++++++-----
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c     | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> --
>  include/linux/bpf.h             |  12 +++-
>  include/linux/filter.h          |   2 +-
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c     |  19 +++--
>  kernel/bpf/core.c               |  21 +++---
>  kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c         |   5 +-
>  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c         |  93 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c  |   7 +-
>  11 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.34.1

Regarding the s390x part, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() needs to call
__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() twice: the first time in order to
compute various offsets, the second time to actually emit the code. So
I would suggest to either keep the loop or use the following fixup:

--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2645,7 +2645,15 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct
bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image,
        struct bpf_tramp_jit tjit;
        int ret;
 
+       /* Compute offsets. */
        memset(&tjit, 0, sizeof(tjit));
+       ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(im, &tjit, m, flags,
+                                           tlinks, func_addr);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       /* Generate the code. */
+       tjit.common.prg = 0;
        tjit.common.prg_buf = image;
        ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(im, &tjit, m, flags,
                                            tlinks, func_addr);

With that:

Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  # on s390x

for the series.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux