On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:14:54PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:30 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > [...] > > + > > +/** > > + * enum execmem_type - types of executable memory ranges > > + * > > + * There are several subsystems that allocate executable memory. > > + * Architectures define different restrictions on placement, > > + * permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used > > + * by these subsystems. > > + * Types in this enum identify subsystems that allocate executable memory > > + * and let architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for > > + * allocations by each subsystem. > > + * > > + * @EXECMEM_DEFAULT: default parameters that would be used for types that > > + * are not explcitly defined. > > + * @EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT: parameters for module text sections > > + * @EXECMEM_KPROBES: parameters for kprobes > > + * @EXECMEM_FTRACE: parameters for ftrace > > + * @EXECMEM_BPF: parameters for BPF > > + * @EXECMEM_TYPE_MAX: > > + */ > > +enum execmem_type { > > + EXECMEM_DEFAULT, > > I found EXECMEM_DEFAULT more confusing than helpful. I hesitated a lot about that, but in the end decided to have EXECMEM_DEFAULT and alias EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT to it because this is what we essentially have now for the most architectures. If you'll take a look at arch-specific patches, in many cases there is only EXECMEM_DEFAULT that an architecture defines and that default is used by all the subsystems. > Song > > > + EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT = EXECMEM_DEFAULT, > > + EXECMEM_KPROBES, > > + EXECMEM_FTRACE, > > + EXECMEM_BPF, > > + EXECMEM_TYPE_MAX, > > +}; > > + > [...] -- Sincerely yours, Mike.