Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] mm: Add policy_name to identify OOM policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2023/9/15 10:28, Bixuan Cui 写道:


在 2023/9/14 20:50, Chuyi Zhou 写道:

Delete set_oom_policy_name, it makes no sense for users to set policy names. 🙂


There can be multiple OOM policy in the system at the same time.

If we need to apply different OOM policies to different memcgs based on different scenarios, we can use this hook(set_oom_policy_name) to set name to identify which policy in invoked at that time.

Just some thoughts.
Well, I thought the system would only load one OOM policy(set one policy name), which would set the prio of all memcgs.

What you mean is that multiple bpf.c may be loaded at the system, and each bpf.c sets the different policy for different memcgs?

No. Not multiple bpf_oompolicy.c but multiple OOM Policy in one BPF Program.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux