Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix unpriv_disabled check in test_verifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 14:06 +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> Commit 1d56ade032a49 changed the function get_unpriv_disabled() to
> return its results as a bool instead of updating a global variable, but
> test_verifier was not updated to keep in line with these changes. Thus
> unpriv_disabled is always false in test_verifier and unprivileged tests
> are not properly skipped on systems with unprivileged bpf disabled.
> 
> Fixes: 1d56ade032a49 ("selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c")
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yep, my bad, without this patch test_verifier fails when
/proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled is set to 1.
Thank you for fixing it.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index 31f1c935cd07d..98107e0452d33 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	get_unpriv_disabled();
> +	unpriv_disabled = get_unpriv_disabled();
>  	if (unpriv && unpriv_disabled) {
>  		printf("Cannot run as unprivileged user with sysctl %s.\n",
>  		       UNPRIV_SYSCTL);






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux