On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 1:32 PM <thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx> > > Resend to remove noise! > > Given the current constraints of the current implementation, struct_ops > cannot be registered dynamically. This presents a significant limitation > for modules like fuse-bpf, which seeks to implement a new struct_ops > type. To address this issue, here it proposes the introduction of a new > API. This API will enable the registering of new struct_ops types from > modules. > > The following code is an example of how to implement a new struct_ops type > in a module with the proposed API. It adds a new type bpf_testmod_ops in > the bpf_testmod module. And, call register_bpf_struct_ops() and > unregister_bpf_struct_ops() when init and exit the module. register_bpf_struct_ops() api implementation is missing in the diff.
